‘Alien Objects’ Discovery Ignites Clash Between Renowned Professor and NASA

alien objects discovery ignites clash between renowned professor and nasa.jpg Science

In a riveting revelation that could reshape our understanding of the cosmos, Professor Avi Loeb, a leading astrophysicist from Harvard, has come forward with claims of having discovered "alien objects" from the depths of the Pacific Ocean. These fragments, which were retrieved from a meteorite that entered Earth’s atmosphere in 2014, have been confirmed by his team to be of interstellar origin. This bold assertion has sparked a contentious debate within the scientific community, with NASA challenging the data’s accuracy and the U.S. Space Command supporting Professor Loeb’s findings.

The controversy ignited when Professor Loeb accused NASA of "arrogance" for rejecting the validity of the data before the analysis results were even published. He has called for NASA to retract their statement discrediting the U.S. Space Command, which claimed that the meteorite fragments were interstellar, and not from within our solar system as NASA had suggested. This dispute underscores a broader discussion about the value of risk-taking in science, the necessity for open-mindedness in astronomical research, and the crucial role of accurate data interpretation in ensuring public safety.

Harvard Professor Clashes with NASA over Interstellar Fragments Discovery

Controversy Surrounding "Alien Objects" Discovery

Yesterday, Harvard professor Avi Loeb and his team announced the confirmation of tiny fragments, found in a meteorite that entered Earth’s atmosphere in 2014, as being of interstellar origin. The claim has sparked a debate with NASA, with the space agency accused of arrogance over their handling of the findings. The professor alleges that NASA dismissed the data surrounding the fragments, which he argues was a mistake.

The Interstellar Debate

Prior to the publication of the results, Loeb, 61, claimed that NASA had inaccurately assessed the data provided by the US Government. He now insists that NASA "retract their published claim that the US Space Command overestimated IM1’s speed by a large factor and that IM1 was a stony meteorite from the solar system", as the recent findings suggest that IM1 was, in fact, interstellar.

The Importance of the Findings

In an interview with IrishStar.com, Loeb emphasized the implications of the findings, stating: "The success of the expedition illustrates the value of taking risks in science despite all odds as an opportunity to discover new knowledge." He went on to explain that approximately 700 of the fragments contained alloys unique to interstellar space, and were formed approximately 13.8 billion years ago, during the Big Bang.

The Discovery and Recovery Process

The tiny pieces, originating from an object less than a meter in size, crashed off the coast of Papua New Guinea in 2014. The US Space Command confirmed in April 2022 that the 1.5-foot-wide meteorite came from another solar system, marking it as the first known interstellar visitor to Earth. Prof Loeb’s team recovered 750 of the marble-sized molten droplets from the seabed, using a magnetic sled. The fragments range from 0.1 mm to 0.7mm in diameter.

The Final Word

In the face of skepticism and personal attacks, Professor Loeb remains firm in his pursuit of science. "My priority is doing science to the best of my ability, going to the meteor site, finding the materials from it, analyzing them in the labs, and showing they’re not from the solar system," he told IrishStar.com, using the metaphor of an eagle rising above a pecking crow to describe his approach.


This discovery, if confirmed, could have significant implications for our understanding of the universe and potentially reshape the way we approach space exploration. The clash between Professor Loeb and NASA illustrates the challenges and debates that often arise in the scientific community as we strive to learn more about the cosmos. It also underscores the importance of open-mindedness, thorough investigation, and rigorous debate in the pursuit of scientific knowledge.

Crive - News that matters